8 Ekim 2008 Çarşamba

(Not) Voting for John McCain

As I indicated, I have sent a letter to the RNC and John McCain's campaign on the reasons I do not plan to vote for him. I have done so, and thought I would enclose it here.
To whom it may concern at the Republican National Committee and the Campaign to elect John McCain,

After much soul-searching and observation of recent events, I have decided not to vote for Senator John McCain and the Republican ticket. Instead, I currently plan to vote for the Constitution Party Candidacy of Chuck Baldwin as a protest vote. I have been a faithful Republican voter since George H. W. Bush ran against Bill Clinton (my first election in which I could vote for president). But I find Senator McCain wanting as a presidential candidate, even though I also find myself unable to support Democratic candidate Barack Obama due to his views on abortion and consistently Left-wing voting record.

Rather than simply cast my vote in silence, which would be emotionally satisfying but ineffective, I thought it wise to send an e-mail in which I lay out my reasoning. This might be useful in guiding the Senator in reaching out to voters like me, or to the GOP in a post-election world.

First, let me start with the straw that broke the camel's back for me - the Bailout/Rescue Bill. This bill was concieved with little public scrutiny, rushed to two separate votes, and was passed with no real explanation beyond "We have to do something." While I was always skeptical of the Bill, I was waiting for the Senator or the President to lay out a clear and argued case for why these maeasures were the right ones to address our economic meltdown. Economics is complex, but the causes of the current crisis were not. The solution itself should be explainable and defendable, and the Senator had multiple opportunities to directly address this. He did not. Instead, we were told again last night that "We had to do something" and to trust the machinery of government to work it out. When the machine has already proven itself to be broken - hence the economic turmoil - you simply can not assume the same machine can fit itself. Proof needs to be offered. None was.

Second, the Senator has yet to enunciate a clear and specific philosophy for his campaign. Say what you will about President Bush, he had a fairly clear philosophy and guiding principles coming into each election. It was clear what he planned to do, how he planned to do it, and what his priorities were. Senator McCain is proud of being a "maverick who crossed party lines", but as often as not this has meant going against the apparent philosophical underpinnings of the Republican party. This means that I am never sure which principles are near and dear and which are negotiable. I do know what the Senator plans to do: work on earmarks, focus on reducing corruption, and work towards energy independence, among others. But I am unclear what his priorities are, and when push comes to shove what is his #1. That came across painfully last night in the debate.

Third, the Senator has yet to give a clear explanation of why this is his moment in history. Senator Obama may be inexperienced, but he has made a clear case for why he deserves to be in the White House: returning dignity and dliberation to the process, correcting the wrongs of slavery, and pulling us back from the excesses of Post-9/11 reactions. Senator McCain, on the other hand, has offered a good resume of skills for the office, but has never explained how history points to him being the next logical link in the chain of executive leadership. I strongly respect his record of wartime, his record of service in the Senate, and his record as a man in his personal life. But at the moment, I do not see why he deserves to be president aside from a sense that it is "his turn".

Please note, none of my concerns have to do with the vice-presidential candidate, Sarah Palin. But I do not vote based on who is up for vice-president.

I hope you find this useful, or at least enlightening, in the day ahead.

Thank you for your time.
Alright, folks. Go ahead and tear it apart. And if you have also decided to go third party, I encourage you to compose, send, and post your own letter. This way, at least the major candidates have a chance to respond before the election.

If I recieve a non-form-letter response, I will post it here.

8 yorum:

  1. Good summary. I will still be voting for John McCain. I think the government's take over of the Health Care system under Barak Obama would be a disaster that could not be repealed. So although I have little confidence in John McCain to do big things, I know he will not move us boldly in the wrong direction.

    YanıtlaSil
  2. I think McCain does have a guiding philosophy (America First, working for the good of the people, not himself). You may not think it is developed enough, but I think he has one.

    I'm not sure I would say a reason to vote against him would be that he has no compelling reason for his presidency. Other than "I'm a compassionate conservative and not liberal and my daddy was president", neither did Bush in 2000. I think McCain could claim that mantle as well (I'm not Washington or as liberal, I have the depth of character to lead).

    Bailout is a compelling reason to vote against him, as is immigration, global warming, finance reform and the other big government programs he espouses (albeit generally with incentives rather than penalties).

    I see McCain as being the lesser of two evils, and I see a 3rd party vote to be legitimate, as long as the candidate fits your criteria of being a) against the bailout b) able to articulate a philosophy of government and c) able to give an explanation of why he should be president at this moment.

    I think protest votes are like protests. Most people look on with bemused expressions, possibly agreeing, but also thinking that the people protesting have gone off the deep end.

    I don't like Obama's policies (although I waffle on voting for him, mainly because of the history and the moment argument). I don't like McCain, but I don't see a compelling reason to vote for another candidate, and I think that voting for a 3rd party candidate will probably result in Obama becoming president. And like CRChair said, I don't think we can afford him, and I don't think there will be any going back.

    I will look into more 3rd parties... maybe I am missing something.

    I do think we should work to educate and reform and work for a more conservative party, and I think an Obama presidency would do that very well, but I fear for the country...

    YanıtlaSil
  3. Nick,

    I respect those who feel they can not vote third party, or should not vote third party. You have a responsibility to do what you think is best for the country. For some, that means doing all you can to help the party win, even if you have doubts. For others, it means doing what you can to help direct the party back to a path you can support. Hence, my decision AND my letter which does not more than make me a dot in a total. It gives clear reasons for why I am voting as I am, and therefore a way to redeem himself in the eyes of similar voters.

    As to the philosophy part, I think you are dead wrong. McCain's theme is not "I think a certain way" but "I have experience and am trustworthy." Bush's theme was his ideas: Conservative values (low tax, firmly pro-life, strong defense, etc.) with a Compassionate approach (faith-based social programs, compromise on social security, etc.) While I admit "Compassionate Conservatism"is a failure, it was a coherent philosophy.

    Again, I am not calling on others to jump ship from McCain. I am simply laying out MY reasons and encouraging voters to clarify their own reasons.

    YanıtlaSil
  4. I am tired of choosing between "sh** on a stick, or sh** on a shingle". I see your letter much like an exit interview. You give reasons that you have hopped off the straight talk express.

    YanıtlaSil
  5. Actually, McCain hopped off the "Straight Talk Express". He was unwilling to give any order of priorities in the debate. Instead, like every politician, he said that we can do all of the items at once and called each issue "one of the most important issues of our time". (Obama did the same thing, but we don't expect him to do anything but talk in generalities.)

    YanıtlaSil
  6. Nomad,

    He bases the "I am trustworthy" on the "I think a certain way - America First".

    You can disagree, but please keep the rhetoric down... I wasn't dead wrong, I just have a different opinion and see things differently.

    YanıtlaSil
  7. By the by... Compassionate Conservatism wasn't a failure. It was never actually tried. Bush abandoned it when he started to grow government for his own ends. That's moral liberalism or something, but it wasn't really conservative. He slapped some conservative ideas onto it, but I don't think he has a conservative philosophy the way Reagan or Goldwater did.

    YanıtlaSil
  8. Nick,

    Apologies if you were offended by the "dead wrong" comment. I stand by my comment that McCain has not espoused a philosophy. Did not mean to offend you - it is my opinion and I realize that I can be wrong. It would be nice, in fact, for McCain to prove me wrong between now and election day.

    YanıtlaSil