Mr. Clean, Nick, and Nora
Originally uploaded by nomad7674.
Here you have proof that while *I* do not like Halloween, I have plenty of friends who revel in the chance to dress up.
Here you have proof that while *I* do not like Halloween, I have plenty of friends who revel in the chance to dress up.
Well, polls indicate that somewhere around a quarter to a third of Republicans will consider going third-party if the nominee is (like Giuliani) personally pro-choice. I parse that as "between one quarter and one third of Republicans need to be pimp-slapped".The commenter makes a valid point. I'm not saying that everyone who claims a party affiliation needs to always vote for that party. I'm registered as a Republican and can probably just barely claim that 50% of the votes I've cast in my lifetime were for Republicans. So that's not what it's about. But, I think his point is valid, that it is downright childish for Christian Conservatives to not get their nominee just once, and to threaten to leave over it. The Republican party has truly given the Christian Right the candidate they've by-and-large wanted for the past several decades. It is the work of the Republican party that has helped these same Christian Conservatives to achieve so much of their agenda. And now, being faced with one election cycle of having someone more to the left as their candidate has gotten them all up in a huff.
The Religious Right has been getting its way in the Republican Party for nearly 30 years, and a lot of them have (it seems to me) forgotten that being part of a coalition means you don't always get every ********* thing you want every single time you ask for it. How DARE these people think of jumping ship the very first time a candidate comes along who isn't 100% on board with 100% of their agenda? "Nominate a pro-lifer or we'll help Hillary win?" What the **** kind of attitude is that?
You know, there's a minority of Republican voters -- not as big as the religious right, but enough that Republicans will never win without us -- who can't stand all the Christian ******** but still vote Republican because of OTHER things the Republicans ostensibly support. The Republicans owe US something for eight years of George ******* Bush, who has sucked up a storm on everything Republicans supposedly stand for EXCEPT the conservative Christian issues. I'm sure there will be another Jesus freak along in 2012 or 2016 for the latest incarnation of the Moral Majority to vote for, but right now, here in 2008, it is a choice between Giuliani and Clinton. That should not be a hard choice for anyone right of center to make.
[To] put it more precisely, neither has a convincing narrative of where we are in history and where we should be headed next.I know there is some of this with every election, but more-so than any other in my experince I have been wondering what exactly the two major parties stand for. Each party has their own reflexive issues: abortion, taxation, etc. But neither party can really explain right now why they do what they do. Reagan was known as the Great Communicator and Clinton was a success because he made people see with his eyes. But I am not seeing that with many of the people running this year. Only Obama seems to even have a real interest.
Successful political parties usually have such narratives. Theodore Roosevelt's Republicans believed in respecting but also regulating private property and in conducting a muscular and assertive foreign policy. This seemed appropriate in a nation that had grown from 5 million to nearly 90 million in the preceding century, that had built the world's largest economy and that had a huge but untapped potential for international power.
Franklin Roosevelt's Democrats believed in government intervention in the economy and a federal safety net, and in using military power to advance freedom and democracy in the world.
When you're behind closed doors, and you're not posturing for the public or for the media,'' [Social Security Administration Commissioner] Astrue said, ``they [Democrats and Republicans] say almost word for word the same thing.
"The squirrel chewed through the wire, was set on fire, fell down directly to where the car was," Tony Millar said. "The squirrel, on fire, slid into the engine compartment and blew up the car.Somewhere, Dreamworks is wondering if they suddenly have the plot for their next animated feature.
"They're always coming around here, chewing through the garbage," he added.
Tony Millar says his sister was fully insured.
Verizon Wireless has been contacting its customers via snail mail to inform them of their intent to share CPNI data with its "affiliates, agents and parent companies (including Vodafone) and their subsidiaries." The company says that customers who do not want their CPNI data shared need to call 1-800-333-9956 to "opt-out." Upon dialing the opt-out number, Verizon customers will be prompted for their phone number, billing ZIP code, and last four digits of their Social Security Numbers (in the case of businesses, their Employer ID numbers). Failure to opt-out will be interpreted by Verizon Wireless as "consent" to the company's data-sharing practices.This data would most likely be used for targetted advertising (call NetFlix customer service and get a text message advertising Blockbuster) but could also be used to advertise themselves to your friends and family who are not yet Verizon Wireless customers. If you are a Verizon customer, please call now. If not, think twice before making the switch.
A comprehensive global study of abortion has concluded that abortion rates are similar in countries where it is legal and those where it is not, suggesting that outlawing the procedure does little to deter women seeking it.Readers know I am ardently Pro-Life and Anti-Abotion (choose your label, as you will). Honestly, I suspect this study is flawed as it is extremely counter-intuitive to me. However, I admit counter-intuitive does not always mean wrong. Quantum mechanics and man-woman social interactions prove that quite easily. And I wonder how different this study would look adjusted for moral and social outlooks.
Moreover, the researchers found that abortion was safe in countries where it was legal, but dangerous in countries where it was outlawed and performed clandestinely. Globally, abortion accounts for 13 percent of women’s deaths during pregnancy and childbirth, and there are 31 abortions for every 100 live births, the study said.
Romney: "These debates are a little like Law and Order. It has a huge cast. The series seems to go on forever. And Fred Thompson shows up at the end."Consensus seems to be that no one embarrassed themselves, but no one distinguished themselves either. And that no matter what the voters think, Romney and Guiliani have decided they are the two to watch.
Thompson: "And to think, I was going to be the best actor on the stage."
When I try to explain my beliefs (that I don't believe in God or a higher power), she cries. I am certainly not trying to deny her mother the right to take her to church, but I don't want to cut my two weekends a month with her short to take her back to her mother's to attend church. Nor do I want her mother telling her that I am going to hell.But the advice columnist's response was excellent and balanced.
What I am trying to say is, the way to help your daughter grow is not to debate the existence of God. It is to go to church with your daughter and experience what she is experiencing.Read on through the article. It is a good read and provides insight into both sides of the religious divide.
You can argue about who is winning and who is losing. But at least watch the game.
For months, Christian conservatives have been escalating their warnings about the risk that nominating Mr. Giuliani could splinter the party. Dr. Dobson wrote a column declaring that he would waste his vote before casting it for either Mr. Giuliani or a Democrat who supports abortion rights like Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton. Richard Land, the top public policy official of the Southern Baptist Convention, has said that nominating a Republican candidate who supports abortion rights would make white evangelical votes “a jump ball” between the Republicans and Democrats, with other issues taking the fore.You may recall I said that I could not vote for the Mayor, despite my respect for him, from Day 1. I doubt that I am among the more extreme members of the anti-abortion wing.