The Obama administration has begun declassifying memos from the GWB years showing what they did and did not consider acceptable means of "enhanced interrogation."
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/04/16/us.torture.documents/index.html
I think in the end that George W. Bush will be judged well by history for Iraq and Afghanistan. I think he even may get away from being entirely blamed for the economic collapse. But I think he will be reviled for all time for the introduction of torture into the lexicon of "acceptable means" for extracting information. By introducing "enhanced interrogation" for terrorists, he has opened the door to using it on anyone. And we are already seeing many Bush-era "bent rules" being used against the very people he hoped to protect. We must always remember that the ends can NEVER justify the means, no matter how noble.
I think many of these things have gone on for generations. It is just in this era of revealing everything that these things are becoming known.
YanıtlaSilDo does "we've always done it" make it any more moral? The difference here is GWB tried to claim it was not only "necessary" but "legal and consistent with American principles".
YanıtlaSilI think GWB will be remembered for his drastic expansion of the federal government (ie: DNS), this expansion of executive powers (ie: warrantless wiretaps), and the destruction of the identity and principles of the GOP.
YanıtlaSil